Audio Interface Mixer For Mac
I bought the smaller Behringer 302usb mixer for a small home recording setup with a budget target of. I think you would be hard pressed to find a better mixer for the price.
I use this for live broadcasting. The build quality is good and the Jacks have positive locking with no slop. The center detents on the knobs is great.
Sound quality is great too. This unit has more features then most people need but again the price is incredible. I get no noticable audio lag even when using the fx processor. Now the down sides. The Bluetooth is not that good for audio quality. To say the manual needs work is an understatement. My only other issue is how short the power cord is.
In closing, I love this mixer and it out performs my expectations. I have and will continue to suggest this mixer to anyone looking.
I love this mixer! Works and sounds better than I expected, especially for the price (right around $150 during the time of this review).
The only reason I rate this a 4 star is because I didn't get the same one that's in the picture. I mean, it doesn't bother me too much, however, I do like to know what I'm getting when I order something and what I got was different than what I ordered. I know it's not that big of a deal but in the photos the LED's for the Effects are Blue, however the one I got it red.
Also the sliders are a different color than what is pictured. Even the box it came in shows it's supposed to be blue and have black sliders, however it didn't. Still works just as great and still sounds amazing! The mixer itself is a 5/5 easily, however.
When I ordered this, it was the only small, battery-powered, self contained mixer with USB input/output that I could find under $100 (heck this one is under $50!). I expected to use it just for teleconference audio mixing until I got a fancier JK Audio RemoteMix 3. I found myself constantly using this little mixer in testing and setup of one-time demonstrations as well as using it in our Podcasting 101 workshop.
If this didn't have a few quirks and had better documentation, I would give it 5 stars. Yes, one can find a bit more durable knobs on higher priced units which drive the price way over $150, but most of these fine laptop/tablet/smartphone attachable mixer/audio interfaces do not work as standalone mixers. Here is a summary of the usual pros and cons, starting with the pros: + compact and solidly built internals + integrated Lithium Ion battery pack + extremely. I bought this to replace my Yamaha MG16CXU Mixer. This mixer is loaded with features.
First and foremost are the balanced XLR-outputs. Each mic has a gain control, Mic 1,2 have compression and if you have high impedance equipment or just need to give a singer a little bit of a boost, each mic has a 26 dB pad. There two stereo line in connections with both 1/4' and RCA and the third line in that has a direct USB feed from a PC using the Yamaha Cubase driver at 24 bit/192kHz. The line in from the PC using the USB has very little latency and has zero ground loop interference. To top it all off, there is phantom power to the mics and 24 SPX effects that can be injected into each channel and you can use the Cubase AI code included to mix it all up yourself on.
Greetings, I really want to start a home recording studio. I have a lot of decent preliminary recording equipment. Just a small list to show what we've collected so far.
TC electronic Intonator Voice processor. Groovetubes GT55 condensor microphone. 2 Shure SM57 M-audio Firewire 410 As far as software goes, I'm using Logic Express 7.2 on a Macbook 2.0 ghz. Right, now thats about it. Now my question is, what would be the advantage of buying a mixer?
I've looked at various, such as the Alesis Multimix. Would it just be for adding more channels or what?
And another question, using logic express, could multi-track mixing work using a mixer through the Firewire 410? Thanks a lot you guys. I'm currently running a mixerless setup. I can record a maximum of 18 distinct channels at a time (though i don't have that many mics or preamps my typical chain: mic - preamp - -(ADAT)- digi002r - p'mac now, i have some friends whose stuff i mix sometimes.
• No support questions outside of the Daily Tech Support sticky. • No posts that aren’t directly related to Apple or the Apple eco-system. 
• Posts must foster reasonable discussion. • No NSFW content. • No editorialized link titles (use the original article’s title if applicable) • No rude, offensive, or hateful comments.
They live out of town and record themselves with an mbox, giving them only 2 channels at a time. They track one instrument at a time, but for drums, they use at least 4 mics. So what they do is run the 4 mics into a little yamaha mixer, mix it down to 2 tracks, and record that. This is suboptimal. They're making critical mix decisions at record time, without the benefit of a good monitoring system. It limits me a lot at mix time.
So i do not recommend this route, unless it's the only way to record something. Another option is to buy a mixing board with direct outs and use those to record. Using the mixer for its pre's and EQ's, but not its mixing section. I use to run a mackie board in this fashion, taking the channel direct outs into a digi001. (guess what - the mackie sounded like crap, and i ditched it and started buying dedicated preamps).
Audio Recording Interface For Mac
That last option reflects many years of studio workflow, the big difference being replacing the tape machine with a computer. For cold's purposes, determine how many simultaneous channels you need. This will be dictated by the micing techniques for each instrument, and if the parts will be layed down one instrument at a time, or with the band playing together. For example, let's say we're recording the typical drum / guitar / bass / vocalist band - four members, four instruments. We can get away with 8 channels of conversion with this scheme: 1. Scratch vox 8. (empty) or room mic working backwards, we see we need anywhere between 6 and 8 preamps (bass could be direct, 8th channel could be empty) and therefore between 6 and 8 mics.
And to get those preamps, you either buy a number of dedicated pre's (my route) or a mixer, using the direct channel outs (a popular choice). With that 410, you're a little stuck, because it can take only 2 mics. For starters, you're going to want at least 4 on drums.
Best Audio Interface For Mac
Your option here is to either buy a new interface (with 4 or more channels), or buy an external preamp and use that on the line ins (caveat: make sure the 410 can truly handle 4 simultaneous inputs; i'm not certain that the front and rear inputs are available at the same time). A very nice starter pre is the. Very capable pre, inexpensive for what it does, and its tracks stack very well with each other.
Firewire Audio Interface For Mac
Those pre's are miles better than what you've got in the 410. Hope that helps.